Picture this: you’ve spent weeks coordinating a school camp, activities booked, permission slips collected, buses arranged.
Then, two days before departure, a parent asks: “What’s your risk assessment?” You know you need one, but you’re not entirely sure if yours covers everything the NSW Department of Education requires.
Sound familiar? You’re not alone. NSW school camps risk assessment is one of the most searched topics among teachers and trip coordinators, and for good reason.
Get it wrong, and you’re exposing students, staff, and your school to serious safety risks and legal liability. Get it right, and you give everyone; parents, principals, and yourself, genuine peace of mind.
This ultimate guide walks you through exactly what a compliant NSW school camps risk assessment must include, the key safety topics to address, a practical template framework you can adapt for any excursion, and what schools safety professionals recommend for overnight and multi-day camps in New South Wales.
Let’s get into it.

What Is NSW School Camps Risk Assessment and Why Is It Non-Negotiable
A risk assessment is a structured, documented process for identifying hazards, evaluating their likelihood and potential consequences, and putting controls in place to reduce or eliminate harm. For school excursions and camps in NSW, it isn’t optional, it’s a legal requirement.
Under the NSW Department of Education’s Excursion Policy, a risk assessment must be conducted and a risk management plan developed before seeking principal approval for any excursion, including overnight camps. This obligation falls on the teacher organising the excursion, with the principal holding overall responsibility for approval.
Beyond policy compliance, the Work Health and Safety (WHS) Act 2011 (NSW) places a legal duty of care on principals and teachers to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harm to students, staff, and volunteers. A thoroughly completed risk assessment is your primary evidence that you’ve met that duty.
Schools safety isn’t just about ticking boxes. It’s about sending students away with confidence that you’ve thought through every reasonable scenario, and that you have a plan when things don’t go as expected.
Pro tip: Keep a copy of your completed risk assessment on file for at least three years after the excursion. If an incident leads to a WorkSafe or legal inquiry, your documentation is your best protection.
The 5 Core Elements Every NSW School Camps Risk Assessment Must Cover
Not every risk assessment template looks the same, but the NSW DoE’s WHS framework consistently requires these five components. Use this as a checklist for your own document.
1. Hazard Identification
List every potential hazard across the entire camp, travel, accommodation, activities, meals, nighttime supervision, and student health needs. Be specific. “Outdoor activities” is not a hazard. “Slips and falls on wet grass near the dam during kayaking” is.
Common hazard categories for school camps include:
- Travel hazards
- Vehicle safety, driver fatigue, student behaviour on buses
- Venue and accommodation
- Fire exits, pool fencing, structural safety, wildlife
- Activity-specific hazards
- Water activities, heights, equipment use
- Environmental hazards
- Weather, sun exposure, insect or snake risk
- Student medical and wellbeing needs
- Allergies, asthma, medications, mental health

2. Risk Rating
Risk rating is the analytical engine of your risk assessment. It transforms a gut feeling (“that seems dangerous”) into a documented, defensible judgement that your principal, DoE auditors, and parents can scrutinise.
Here’s how to do it properly.
How the 5×5 matrix works
Every hazard gets scored on two independent scales, each running from 1 to 5.
Likelihood measures how probable it is that the hazard will actually cause harm during this specific camp, not in general, but given your students, venue, activities, and controls.
Ask:
If we ran this camp 100 times, how often would this hazard lead to an incident?
Consequence measures how serious the harm would be if the hazard did result in an incident. This is not about what’s most likely to happen, it’s about the worst credible outcome.
Multiply (or cross-reference on a matrix) the two scores. The resulting number or zone is your inherent risk rating, the risk level before you apply any controls. NSW DoE uses four rating bands:
| Rating | Action required |
|---|---|
| Low (1–4) | Acceptable. Proceed with standard precautions. Review periodically. |
| Medium (5–9) | Manageable. Document controls clearly. Monitor during the excursion. |
| High (10–16) | Must add further controls before proceeding. Confirm residual risk is Medium or lower. |
| Extreme (17–25) | Do not proceed until risk is reduced. May require principal and DoE endorsement. |
Any hazard rated High or Extreme cannot simply be noted and left. You must implement additional controls, re-rate the hazard with those controls in place (this is the residual risk), and confirm the residual rating is acceptable before the excursion is approved.
The Likelihood Scale (1–5)
| Score | Descriptor | Practical meaning for school camps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rare | Would only happen under extraordinary circumstances, e.g. a structural collapse at an accredited venue |
| 2 | Unlikely | Could happen, but hasn’t in recent memory at similar camps, e.g. anaphylaxis reaction (low-incidence but high-stakes) |
| 3 | Possible | Happens occasionally at school camps across NSW, e.g. a student sprain during outdoor activities |
| 4 | Likely | Will probably happen at least once, e.g. minor cuts or blisters on a multi-day bush walk |
| 5 | Almost certain | Expected to happen repeatedly, e.g. sunburn if no sun protection is enforced on a summer camp |
The Consequence Scale (1–5)
| Score | Descriptor | Practical meaning for school camps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Negligible | First aid only, no time off, e.g. a minor graze |
| 2 | Minor | Medical treatment required, short recovery, e.g. a sprained ankle |
| 3 | Moderate | Hospitalisation or significant injury, e.g. a broken bone, serious allergic reaction |
| 4 | Major | Permanent impairment or long-term harm, e.g. a serious head injury, near-drowning |
| 5 | Catastrophic | Death or multiple serious injuries, e.g. drowning, anaphylactic fatality, bus accident |
A critical point: rate consequence at its worst credible level
A common mistake is to rate consequence based on what’s most likely to happen rather than what could happen.
A student falling during a kayaking activity will probably just get wet (Consequence 1). But if that student can’t swim and isn’t wearing a life jacket, the worst credible outcome is drowning (Consequence 5).
Rate for the credible worst case, that’s what drives your control decisions.
Understanding Residual Risk
Your initial rating is the inherent risk, what exists before controls. After you document your control measures, you re-rate the hazard. This second rating is the residual risk. It should always be lower than the inherent risk, and it must reach an acceptable level (generally Medium or below) for the excursion to proceed.
For example:
- Student drowning during dam kayaking session
- Inherent risk: Likelihood 3 × Consequence 5 = Extreme (15)
- Controls applied: mandatory life jackets, direct supervision (1:6 ratio), briefing on entering the water, rope boundary markers, first aider on shore
- Residual risk: Likelihood 1 × Consequence 5 = High (5) → re-assessed as Medium with controls in place
This is the documented logic trail a principal needs to approve the activity.
3. Control Measures (Using the Hierarchy of Controls)
Once you’ve rated each hazard, the next question is: what are you actually going to do about it? This is where the Hierarchy of Controls comes in.
NSW DoE’s WHS procedures require you to work through this hierarchy in order, starting at the top and moving down only when a higher-level control isn’t reasonably practicable.
The hierarchy exists because not all controls are equally effective. Controls at the top of the hierarchy reduce or remove the risk at its source. Controls at the bottom rely on human behaviour, and humans, especially groups of excited students, are unreliable.
The lower you go in the hierarchy, the more your safety depends on people doing the right thing every time. That’s why layering multiple controls is always safer than relying on just one.
Level 1: Elimination
The most effective control is removing the hazard entirely. If an activity is rated Extreme and no combination of lower-level controls can bring the residual risk to an acceptable level, elimination is the correct decision, cancel or cut that activity from the program.
In practice, elimination at school camps might look like: removing cliff jumping from a river excursion, cancelling a kayaking session when river levels are dangerously high, or deciding not to use a campfire when total fire ban conditions apply.
Elimination feels like a loss, but it is always the safest and most defensible decision when other controls are insufficient.
Level 2: Substitution
Substitution means replacing a hazardous activity or material with something that achieves a similar outcome but carries lower risk. Rather than eliminating an activity entirely, you redesign it.
Examples at school camps: replacing open-water kayaking with a sheltered dam activity; substituting a rope climb with a lower-height challenge course; using an inflatable jumping cushion instead of a trampoline with exposed springs.
Berrima Retreat’s kangaroo jumper, for instance, is a substitution by design, it delivers the excitement of jumping at height but with a significantly softer landing surface than a traditional trampoline, which reduces the consequence rating for falls considerably.
Substitution is particularly useful when you want to preserve the educational or team-building value of an activity while reducing the inherent risk score.
Level 3: Engineering Controls
Engineering controls are physical modifications to the environment or equipment that reduce risk independently of human behaviour. Because they don’t rely on students or staff remembering to do something, they are more reliable than administrative controls.
School camp examples include: pool fencing and self-latching gates, life jackets that must be physically worn before entering the water, helmet requirements enforced at the equipment rack, non-slip matting in shower areas, secured storage for medications, and rope or buoy boundaries demarcating safe swimming zones.
A camp venue with proper engineering controls already in place, certified fencing, accredited activity equipment, compliant fire safety infrastructure, materially reduces the work your risk assessment has to do.
When evaluating venues, ask specifically what engineering controls exist for each activity. A venue that can answer this clearly is one that takes safety seriously.
Level 4: Administrative Controls
Administrative controls are the policies, procedures, supervision arrangements, briefings, and rules that govern how people behave during the camp. They are the most commonly used controls at school excursions, and the most commonly over-relied upon.
Examples include: staff-to-student supervision ratios, pre-activity safety briefings, buddy systems near water, student behaviour codes, sign-in and sign-out procedures for dormitories, timed check-ins during free time, and protocols for reporting incidents.
Administrative controls are necessary, but they depend entirely on consistent human compliance. A supervision ratio only works if the supervising staff member is actually watching. A safety briefing only works if students take it seriously and remember it 20 minutes later when they’re excited and distracted.
This is why administrative controls must always be layered with engineering controls for any activity rated Medium or above, they are a supplement, not a substitute.
Level 5: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
PPE sits at the bottom of the hierarchy because it is the last line of defence, not the first. It doesn’t reduce the likelihood of an incident occurring, it only reduces the severity of harm if one does. A helmet doesn’t prevent a fall; it reduces the consequence of one.
School camp PPE includes: helmets for cycling or climbing activities, life jackets for any water activity, closed-toe shoes on bush walks, sun hats and SPF 50+ sunscreen during outdoor sessions, and a fully stocked first aid kit accessible to staff at all times.
PPE must always accompany other controls, never replace them. Putting a helmet on a student and calling it done is not an adequate response to a High-rated hazard. The hierarchy is not a checklist where you pick one level, it’s a framework that asks you to apply as many levels as are reasonably practicable, working from the top down.
4. Supervision Planning
The risk assessment must document the level and type of supervision for every activity. NSW policy identifies five supervision modes ranging from direct (staff present at the activity, hands-on) through to self-reliant (minimal oversight for mature, capable groups).
For most primary and junior secondary camps, direct or indirect supervision is appropriate across all activities.
Always document your staff-to-student ratio. For activities near water, NSW guidelines are explicit: constant, direct adult supervision is required regardless of student age.

5. Emergency Response Planning
No risk assessment is complete without a documented emergency procedure. If something goes wrong on camp, the last thing you want is staff looking at each other asking “what do we do?” An emergency is the worst time to improvise, and the best defence against panic is a plan that every adult on the trip has read, discussed, and rehearsed before departure.
Your emergency response plan should assign specific roles by name, not just by title. Four roles must be explicitly covered:
- 000 caller
- One named staff member makes the call and stays on the line. Everyone else keeps working.
- Roll and records holder
- One staff member retrieves the attendance list and individual medical plans and hands them to emergency services on arrival.
- Emergency services liaison
- One staff member goes to the site entrance to meet and direct paramedics or fire crews in, especially critical at rural or unfamiliar venues.
- School and parent contact
- One staff member calls the principal and begins notifying families, following your school’s Incident Notification and Response Policy.
Also document: the address and phone number of the nearest hospital, the physical location of your first aid kit on site, and your evacuation assembly point.
Run through this plan with all attending staff the morning of departure, not in an email, out loud. Five minutes of verbal rehearsal is worth more than three pages of documentation nobody has read.
Pro tip: Save a photo of your emergency response plan on every attending staff member’s phone. When adrenaline kicks in, having it one tap away beats searching through a folder.
Key School Camp Safety Topics to Address in Your NSW Risk Assessment
This is where many templates fall short. A truly comprehensive NSW school camps risk assessment doesn’t just cover activities, it addresses the full scope of school camp safety topics that affect student wellbeing across the entire excursion.
Student Medical and Health Needs
Every student attending a school camp should have a current medical information form on file. Collect these before booking, not the day before departure. Your risk assessment should explicitly address:
- Individual health care plans (asthma, anaphylaxis, diabetes, epilepsy)
- Medication storage and administration on site
- Access to the nearest hospital or medical centre
- First aid qualifications of attending staff
At minimum, one attending staff member must hold a current first aid certificate. For camps involving water activities, that person should also hold a CPR and rescue endorsement.

Child Protection and Working With Children Requirements
All staff, camp venue employees, and volunteers who work directly with students must hold a valid Working With Children Check (WWCC) clearance. Your risk assessment and planning documentation should confirm this.
The obligation to report suspected risk of harm to a child continues throughout the excursion, this doesn’t pause because you’re away from school.
Site Accreditation
When selecting a camp venue, NSW guidelines give preference to sites accredited through recognised schemes such as NARTA (National Accommodation, Recreation and Tourism Accreditation). If your chosen venue isn’t independently accredited, the teacher-in-charge must satisfy themselves, and document that the venue meets an equivalent safety standard.
Behaviour Management
Your risk assessment should reference your school’s behaviour code for excursions, and students (and parents) should receive a copy before camp. Document how behavioural incidents, particularly those that create a safety risk for others, will be managed, including the process for contacting parents and arranging early return if necessary.
Life Ready Integration (Years 11–12)
For senior schools delivering the mandatory Life Ready program via a camp format, the risk assessment needs to account for the specific content areas being delivered , including sessions on mental health and wellbeing, which may require additional pastoral care planning.
Life Ready camps must supplement outdoor recreation activities with timetabled lesson or seminar delivery, meaning your supervision and scheduling plan needs to reflect both.
How to Choose a Camp Venue That Supports Your Risk Assessment
The right venue can genuinely make your risk assessment easier to complete, because a well-run camp site has already done a large portion of the safety work.
When evaluating venues, look for:
- Independent accreditation (NARTA or equivalent Australian standard)
- Qualified activity instructors with relevant certifications
- WWCC clearances for all staff interacting with students
- Public liability insurance of at least $20 million
- Documented site risk assessments they can share with you
- Emergency protocols – including proximity to medical care
- Clear allergen and dietary management procedures
Venues across the Southern Highlands region of NSW are increasingly sought after for school camps and excursions because of their proximity to Sydney (often under 90 minutes) and the range of outdoor activities available.
Group accommodation properties like Berrima Retreat in Berrima offer exclusive hire for school groups, structured activities including kayaking, team challenges, and outdoor cooking, and can provide supporting safety documentation to complement your school’s risk assessment.
Always ask any venue: “What is your emergency response procedure, and who is the qualified first aider on site during our stay?” The quality of that answer tells you a lot.

Conclusion
A well-completed NSW school camps risk assessment isn’t just a bureaucratic requirement, it’s the foundation of a safe, successful camp experience for every student in your care. Schools safety in New South Wales is built on preparation, documentation, and the willingness to ask “what if?” before problems arise rather than after.
To recap the essentials: understand your legal obligations under the NSW DoE Excursion Policy and WHS Act, use the Hierarchy of Controls to address every hazard, cover all school camp safety topics including travel, medical needs, child protection, and behaviour management, and choose venues that actively support your safety planning. Customise your template to your specific group, venue, and activities, and review it on the day.
If this guide has been useful, consider sharing it with your colleagues and school excursion coordinators. The more NSW teachers have access to quality risk assessment resources, the safer school camps become for everyone.
What’s the biggest challenge you face when completing a camp risk assessment? Drop your thoughts in the comments below, your experience might help a fellow teacher on their next excursion.
Frequently Asked Questions: NSW School Camps Risk Assessment
- Who is responsible for completing the risk assessment for a school camp in NSW?
- The teacher organising the excursion is responsible for completing the risk assessment and risk management plan. The principal is responsible for reviewing and approving it before the excursion proceeds.
- Does a risk assessment need to be completed for every excursion, even short day trips?
- Yes. Under the NSW DoE Excursion Policy, a risk assessment is required for all excursions, including day trips. The level of detail should be proportionate to the complexity and duration of the activity.
- Can I use a template from another state or from the internet?
- You can use an external template as a starting point, but it must be adapted to align with NSW DoE WHS procedures, reference your specific activities and venue, and be customised for your student group.
- What happens if an incident occurs and we didn’t have a risk assessment?
- Failure to complete a required risk assessment can expose the teacher, principal, and school to significant legal liability under NSW WHS legislation. It may also affect the school’s insurance position.
- How far in advance does the risk assessment need to be submitted for approval?
- Most NSW schools require risk assessments to be submitted for principal approval at least two to four weeks before the excursion date. Check your school’s specific excursion policy for exact timelines.
- Does the Life Ready program change our risk assessment requirements for a senior camp?
- Life Ready content delivered via a camp format requires additional planning around program content, particularly for sensitive topics like mental health and wellbeing. The pastoral care dimension should be reflected in your supervision plan.